๐Ÿ’คQuietscore 0.0Jun 29, 2026ยท2606.30549cs.HCcs.AIcs.SE

To Tab or Not to Tab: Measuring Critical Engagement in AI Code Completion Tools Using Behavioral Signals and Attention Checks

Jessica Hutchison, Ian Tyler Applebaum, Kenneth Angelikas, Kush Rakesh Patel, Phuoc Nguyen, Antonio Lazaro, Nicholas Rucinski, Rahad Arman Nabid, Stephen MacNeil

Narrative

No narrative written yet. The narrate cron picks top papers by score; run /api/cron/narrate to populate this manually.

Abstract

AI code completion tools, such as Github Copilot, provide students with code suggestions to help them write programs. However, recent qualitative studies suggest that students fail to critically evaluate these suggestions. We present Clover, a code completion tool that logs students' interactions with code suggestions and additionally offers attention checks to probe reflective engagement during programming tasks. We also develop a taxonomy of behavioral interaction metrics for AI-assisted programming, informed by literature. We analyzed relationships between interaction patterns, engagement with attention checks, and task performance. We observed that higher rates of tab accept were associated with lower attention check performance, while increased dwell time was associated with higher attention check performance. We conclude by discussing how programming process data and attention checks might support reflective engagement in AI-assisted programming.

Citation timeline
Not enough citation snapshots yet to plot a timeline. Come back after a few cron runs.